Talk:Terence

Text on Infobox a Bad Color.
I can barely see it, and when I do, it hurts my eyes.
 * What do you mean? It's fineQazqaz555 02:45, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think they mean the black text on dark red. It can be pretty bad on a darker monitor.
 * Also, where did we get the info that the it's supposed to be a hawk? Considering it's just the regular red bird, but fatter, I thought it would also be a cardinal. -64.206.238.155 16:39, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

Official name?
Rovio's Angry Birds site is now calling this guy the "Fat Bird" for the plush toy. --71.176.41.169 00:52, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, his real name is Terrence, not FAT BIRD.
 * I don't think that his name is Terrence. I think that "Terrence" is just a character in the comics, like little timmy. It should be noted that you can't assume his "revealed" or "real" name, as there is more than one Big Brother Bird in existence. I suppose we should create a seperate page or section regarding "Terrence". Qazqaz  555  23:31, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, Rovio has said that his name is Terence (one 'r') via their Twitter feed. I believe the page should remain as "Big Brother Bird" and the Infobox as well, but the statement is true: Big Brother Bird's name is Terence. AMslimfordy 23:38, March 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * I see no reason why Fat Bird shouldn't be one of the nicknames... the plush page lists it as both the Big Brother Bird and the Fat Bird. RizDub 17:56, March 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * My concern, with any of the birds is when do you draw the line at nicknames? You can have 40 for each bird if you don't lock it down and draw a line in the sand. Since he actually has a confirmed name, why bother with unofficial nicknames? DoctorOmega 18:13, March 13, 2012 (UTC)

Fat Cardinal
Is his species suppose to be fat cardinal or is that a vandalizer who did it? Angrybirdarmy
 * I don't see that anywhere AMslimfordy 18:28, March 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * In the infobox, his species is listed as "cardinal" because he is the "big brother" of Red Bird. Personlly, I don;t like including species unless we know 100% for sure, like with Rio.  But I don't think it a big deal and I'm sure a huge chunk of the info we have will have to be rewritten once that National Geographic book comes out in September. DoctorOmega 19:53, March 11, 2012 (UTC)