Thread:AquaChoco1997/@comment-39878384-20200514174028

Taking advantage of this chat, am I the only one who is a little annoyed that Rovio continues to overexploit the same repeated birds? I mean, they used to bring new birds back in 2010, with Hal, Bubbles, Stella, Terrence, Tony, Hockey Bird, etc. As more new content was released, the game became more diverse but I feel that only Red, Chuck and Bomb are being exploited a lot with games that are far from the gameplay of the original Angry Birds games. I mean, I imagine an Angry Birds game in the style of Angry Birds 2 where you can collect a lot of birds with different powers similar to Angry Birds Star Wars 2, that I liked because the levels were not so repetitive, there was a variety and that made me I liked it, and I personally have several ideas for new birds. in addition to that new characters in the saga would enrich the canonical history, they could be characters from the two angry birds movies creating a story uniting all those universes, I imagine a game with all the birds in the history of the saga like Tony, Hockey Bird, the flock of Stella, Zeta as a playable bird (I imagine Zeta would be like a power up just like the Powerful Eagle, just like in the movie, Zeta could be shot in a giant ball of ice), also using completely new birds, I I'm good at drawing and making new bird fannarts with new skills in case you're interested. What I mean is that Rovio misuses his game a lot, it has potential, but being always the same and releasing games that are far from the classic Angry Birds style like a tennis game ... for that reason, most people think that Angry Birds is a game that is already forgotten like Plants vs Zombies or Zuma Deluxe. 